Public Procurement Update June 2021

On 3 June 2021, the Government issued the National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS), and the associated Procurement Policy Note (PPN). George Dale explains what each document does.
- Details
What does each document do?
The NPPS sets out priorities for public procurement from now until the end of 2024, and discusses how contracting authorities can incorporate these priorities into their day-to-day procurement activities.
The PPN gives background information on the NPPS, guidance for contracting authorities on applying the NPPS, and a brief outline of future legislation which will put aspects of the advisory NPPS into law.
What are the key points in each document?
NPPS
In future, contracting authorities should take account of certain national priorities whilst exercising their procurement functions. These national priorities are split into three strands:
- Social Value; is what you deliver adding value to your community?
- Commercial and Procurement Delivery; are the policies and processes you use to manage your procurement portfolio fit for purpose?
- Skills and Capability for Procurement; is your organisation’s procurement capability and capacity sufficient to ensure value for money across your procurement portfolio?
The NPPS sets out each strand in further detail.
PPN
Contracting authorities should familiarise themselves with the NPPS and should consider the Social Value, Commercial and Procurement Delivery, and Skills and Capability sections of the NPPS going forward.
The government’s legislative programme will include legislation requiring:
- all contracting authorities to have regard to the NPPS when procuring;
- contracting authorities with a spend of over £200m to publish procurement pipelines and
- benchmark their procurement capability from April 2022; and
- contracting authorities with a spend of over £100m to publish procurement pipelines and
- benchmark their procurement capability from April 2023.
What are the practical points to consider?
All public procurement professionals will now need to consider Social Value alongside existing value for money considerations.
Contracting Authorities should:
- Consider Social Value aspects of the NPPS which could easily be integrated into upcoming projects, bearing in mind that the NPPS states that contracts which simply tack on (or “gold-plate”) social value benefits should not be chosen if they are not the best value for money solution for the project.
- Review their upcoming procurement pipeline to determine when reporting will likely be required (if at all).
- Evaluate current procurement standards and suggested benchmarks for performance and consider which set of standards they wish to benchmark their procurement performance against.
- Assess existing procurement processes and management procedures and consider how NPPS priorities can be integrated into these.
- Consider whether procurement teams have the right organisational capabilities and capacities in place, with sufficient procurement skills and resources for their planned procurement programme.
George Dale is a Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
Changing Course: Navigating Variations Under JCT and NEC Contracts
May 21, 2025
Tiah Weekes explains the process of changes to contracts in the field of construction.
Lessons in public consultation: High Court finds failures in local authority’s consideration of consultation responses
May 21, 2025
George McLellan and Samuel Hart explore the High Court decision ruling that Lambeth Council broke the law in the process of establishing an LTN in the borough.
Allocating risk in amended JCT contracts: Lessons from John Sisk & Son Limited v Capital & Centric (Rose) Limited
May 12, 2025
David Owens and Elizabeth Withers explore recent developments in construction contract case law.
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |