

The final say
News
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Features Test


Producing robust capacity assessments and the approaches to assessing capacity

Disability discrimination and proportionality in housing management

Cross-border deprivation of liberty

Dealing with unexplained deaths and inquests

Court of Protection case update: May 2025
Features


Producing robust capacity assessments and the approaches to assessing capacity

Disability discrimination and proportionality in housing management

Cross-border deprivation of liberty

Dealing with unexplained deaths and inquests

Court of Protection case update: May 2025
Sponsored articles
What is the role of the National Trading Standards Estate & Letting Agency Team in assisting enforcement authorities?
Webinars
Is Omeprazole the new EDS?
More features

Provision of same-sex intimate care
Court of Protection case update: April 2025
High Court guidance on Article 3 engagement in care at home cases
‘Stitch’, capacity and complexity
Issuing proceedings in best interests cases
Court of Protection case law update: March 2025
The Health and Social Care (Wales) Bill Series – Regulation and Inspection of Social Care
The Health and Social Care (Wales) Bill Series – Direct Payments for NHS Continuing Healthcare
What is the right approach to Care Act assessments?
Disabled people in immigration bail: the duties of the Home Office and local authorities
Capacity, insight and professional cultures
Court of Protection update: February 2025
Setting care home fees
Could this be the end for local authority-provided residential care?
“On a DoLS”
It’s all about the care plan
Court of Protection case update: January 2025
Mental capacity and expert evidence
Best interests, wishes and feelings
Capacity, sexual relations and public protection – another go-round before the Court of Appeal
Court of Protection Update - December 2024
Fluctuating capacity, the “longitudinal approach” and practical dilemmas
Capacity and civil proceedings
Recovering adult social care charges via insolvency administration orders
Court of Protection case update: October 2024
Communication with protected parties in legal proceedings
The way forward for CQC – something old, something new….
The Ombudsman, DoLS and triaging – asking the impossible?
Outsourcing and the Human Rights Act 1998 – the consequences
Commissioning care and support in Wales: new code of practice
Council defeats claim brought on behalf of 101 year old over care home closure
- Details
A city council has successfully defended a High Court challenge brought on behalf of a 101-year-old resident over its decision to close her care home.
Claimants apply to Court of Appeal over approach to deprivation of liberty cases
- Details
An application has been made to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal two key parts of a ruling by the President of the Court of Protection that was intended to streamline the handling of deprivation of liberty cases after the Cheshire West judgment.
County council puts care home closures on hold following legal challenge
- Details
A county council has agreed to put its care home closure programme on hold after a legal challenge from a local resident.
Court of Protection judge slams council for depriving autistic woman of her liberty
- Details
A judge has accused a county council of “a systemic failure” in a strongly-worded ruling in which he found the authority to have wrongfully deprived a 19-year-old autistic woman of her liberty and breached her human rights.
Government agrees to reconsider funding for local welfare assistance schemes
- Details
The Government is to re-think its ending of funding for local welfare assistance schemes after legal action supported by a charity and a London borough.
Mental Health Network issues guide on minimising use of restrictive practices
- Details
The Mental Health Network has issued a guide to how practitioners can use the Department of Health’s guidance Positive and Proactive Care: Reducing the Need for Restrictive Interventions, published last April, which promotes the development of therapeutic environments and minimising the use of restrictive practices other than as a last resort.
Working with the Care Quality Commission, the network said its guide highlights the key parts of the DH’s guidance.
These include:
- restrictive practices should be reduced over two years and be used only in emergencies, with board members informed of a trust’s policy and management plan;
- an objective of ending prone (face-down) restraint;
- recovery-based restrictive intervention reduction approaches should be implemented, overseen by an executive director who would also be responsible for reducing restrictive practices;
- an annual report should be published on the use of restrictive interventions.
The network said trusts’ plans should be person-centred, values-based and informed by skilled assessment of the probable reasons why a person’s behaviour might cause concern.
They should be formulated with service users and if appropriate an advocate, carer or relation.
Mental Health Network chief executive Stephen Dalton said: “The guidance makes some significant steps to clarify definitions of restrictive practice and sets a clearer framework for reporting, but challenges remain.
“By developing this in concert with the CQC we hope that this briefing makes it clear what the expectations are for providers to deliver on this agenda and how progress will be monitored.”
Mark Smulian
Page 235 of 270
Locums
Case Law Update
The final say
In association with...
Poll
in association with...
Events

Directory
