Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Local authorities invited to submit applications for designated family judge trailblazer pilot
The Department for Education has published information for local authorities on how to submit an application to take part in a designated family judge (DFJ) trailblazer pilot.
- Details
The pilot is aimed at reducing delays in public law proceedings in the family court.
In public law, the annual national average for the time children spend in the family justice system over 2021 to 2023 is 46 weeks, when the statutory requirement is 26 weeks.
In November 2022, the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane reiterated the need for practitioners to “reconnect with the core principles of the Public Law Outline”, to ensure that the statutory requirement of completing each case within 26 weeks is met once again.
The Department for Education (DfE) revealed that the DFJ pilot will involve local authorities from five selected designated family judge areas working with a delivery partner to “co-design and implement solutions to reduce court delays”.
Drawing on recent research which gathered evidence on the root cause of delays, the DfE noted that “a whole system approach is needed” in order to achieve a substantial reduction in court delays.
It added: “To achieve this, and mitigate individual agencies working in silos, the pilot will involve a Delivery Partner working directly with local authorities from 5 selected DFJ Trailblazer areas.”
It noted that the Delivery Partner will undertake a “deep-dive analysis” to diagnose the causes of delay within each area and will co-design solutions to these causes of delay.
“Solutions should focus on aligning system governance, improving pre-proceedings data and practice, creating vehicles and incentives for multi-agency collaboration and helping children and families to navigate the system”, the DfE added.
The pilot will run from January 2024 until March 2025.
From April 2024, local authorities from the five areas will implement the solutions with support from the Delivery Partner, “with a view to achieving a substantial reduction in court delays”.
The deadline for local authorities to submit their applications is midday on 17 November 2023.
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm