Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Local family justice pilot launched in Dorset as part of 'reimagining pre-proceedings' project
Family Rights Group has announced Dorset as the local family justice pilot area to help “safely avert the need for care proceedings”, by providing early partnership working for children and families.
- Details
The pilot, set to last 15 months, will bring together families, Dorset Council, partner agencies, local services, and the Dorset Family Court to create the conditions for families to get the help they and their children need at an earlier stage, the charity said.
The Dorset pilot is part of a wider ‘Reimagining pre-proceedings’ project, drawing on learning from the Care Crisis Review and other key reports.
Family Rights Group said the pilot would allow families to “understand and address social workers’ concerns and have their voices heard”, and practitioners would feel equipped to work in an effective way with families, “drawing on their own knowledge and the insights and experiences of families”.
The pilot will commence with families with experience of the child welfare system sitting down with social workers, senior managers, judges and others working in the local family justice area, to identify what is working well in Dorset, and what needs to improve.
Family Rights Group revealed that “useful learning” from the project will be shared.
Welcoming the pilot, Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, said: “The aim of the Dorset pilot to reimagine pre-proceedings is consistent with the recommendations of the Public Law Working Group report, a collaborative piece of work by professionals from all sectors working on child protection cases in the Family Justice System.
"I am glad that the messages in the report are being put into effect on the ground in Dorset. It is my earnest hope that we will begin to see a real improvement in the system’s ability to address the needs of the children and families at the centre of these important cases.”
According to charity Become, there are more children in care than ever before. In England alone, 83,840 were in care as at 31 March 2023.
Cathy Ashley, Chief Executive at Family Rights Group, said: “At a time when record numbers of children are in the care system, the Dorset pilot presents a unique opportunity to help safely avert the need for care proceedings by supporting the child welfare and family justice system to deliver early, effective partnership working with children and families.”
Theresa Leavy, Executive Director for People – Children, at Dorset Council, said: “We are delighted to be the pilot area, and at the forefront of positive change which will help to shape the best support possible for children and families in Dorset. We are looking forward to working within the broader systems our families and children experience, boosting collaboration, focusing on people’s strengths and restoring relationships.”
Lottie Winson
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm