Local Government Lawyer

Demo Midpage Premium

Newsletter registration

Subscribe

* indicates required
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at info@localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

The Supreme Court will next week consider a case over whether an appellant father’s application for a writ of habeas corpus in respect of his children, who are being raised in a local authority's care, should have been granted.

The court said the appeal in The Father (Appellant) v Worcestershire County Council (Respondent) concerns an application for a writ of habeas corpus, a historic court order which, if granted, requires the release of a detained person.

The appellant unsuccessfully applied for a writ of habeas corpus in relation to his two children, who are currently in the care of the respondent, Worcestershire County Council.

On 9 June 2023, the Worcester Family Court granted Worcestershire a care order in relation to the children pursuant to section 31(1)(a) Children Act 1989.

The effect of the care order is to give the council parental responsibility for the children. That order remains in effect and the children are currently living with foster carers.

The father did not pursue a statutory appeal against that order under the Children Act 1989, but applied for a writ of habeas corpus for the return of his children.

On 15 April 2024, that application was dismissed at a brief hearing in the High Court.

The father appealed. On 20 June 2024, the Court of Appeal found that the High Court hearing had been procedurally unfair and set aside that decision.

The Court of Appeal noted that the father's fundamental argument was that a statutory condition for the making of a care order under section 31(2) of the Children's Act 1989 had not been satisfied, meaning the care order had been made without jurisdiction.

Having heard the father on the substance of the appeal, the Court of Appeal itself decided to dismiss his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The father appealed to the Supreme Court.

A Supreme Court panel comprising Lord Reed, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt, Lord Stephens and Lady Simler will hear the case on 15 October 2024.



Locums

 

 

Poll

in association with...

Lexis 200 wide


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Events

Demo Premium Event
Recruitment 970x250 Test