Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Local authority told by Ombudsman to remove fly-tipped mattress from river on council land
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has recommended that the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames council remove a mattress that had been dumped in a river in a council-run park, after the local authority argued it was “not its responsibility”.
- Details
The Ombudsman found that based on government guidance, it was the council’s duty to remove the waste, as it was in “water on council land”.
The man behind the complaint had asked Kingston that the mattress be removed.
However, the council argued it was “not its responsibility” and suggested the man contact the Environment Agency instead, the Ombudsman noted.
The man spent four months complaining to the council before turning to the Ombudsman, during which time the mattress “remained a blight on the environment in the park”, the Ombudsman report stated.
Following investigation, the Ombudsman concluded that it was the council’s duty to remove the waste, and criticised its “inflexibility”.
To remedy the injustice caused, the watchdog recommended the council apologise to the man, remove the mattress from the river and “circulate guidance to staff highlighting Government guidance on fly-tipped waste”.
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, Amerdeep Somal said: “I am disappointed by the council’s inflexibility in this case, and quite astonished it has taken such a long time to put right what should have been a simple task to remove the mattress from the river, which is barely ankle deep.
“It absolutely should not have taken months of correspondence and our investigation for the council to realise it should act.
“Fly-tipping of this type is a blight on local communities and affects people using the park for leisure and exercise. People care about their local environment and this could, and should, have been easily addressed: I was surprised by the lack of value and pride the council appeared to put in maintaining the park that it provides for its residents at significant cost.”
Following the investigation, the Ombudsman revealed that the council has since removed the mattress.
A Kingston Council Spokesperson said: "We take our responsibility as a council very seriously and are committed to supporting our residents in preventing, clearing and prosecuting fly tipping in our borough.
"Our fly tipping team aims to clear incidents within 24 hours once reported. We have also been one of the first councils to use technology and the ‘Internet of Things’ to protect our borough, with motion activated cameras that notify us when a fly tip may have occurred.
"More than this, the council’s policies, priorities and actions show that we are dedicated to protecting and improving Kingston’s public green spaces, parks, woodlands and riversides. These are vital for the physical and mental well-being of the borough's communities, and support habitats for the many species that also call Kingston home.
"Protecting our environment is everyone’s responsibility - councils, residents, businesses and our regulators. We accept the ruling, which was primarily one of defining roles and responsibilities between councils and the Environment Agency."
Lottie Winson
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm