Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
LLG, ADSO and Bevan Brittan issue guidance for local authorities on remote meetings following High Court judgment
LLG (Lawyers in Local Government), the Association of Democratic Services Officers (ADSO) and David Kitson of Bevan Brittan have issued a 12-page guidance document for local authorities on remote meetings in light of recent High Court judgments.
- Details
LLG said: “Many questions have been raised following the High Court judgment in relation to the application for a declaration that current legislation permits remote meetings, which was brought by Hertfordshire County Council, LLG and ADSO.
"In particular, members have been concerned about the scope of the judgment, and what steps can be taken now that the Flexibility Regulations have come to an end whilst adhering to the restrictions and guidance currently in place due to the pandemic, and moving forward, if the roadmap becomes interrupted.”
The document – Guidance on Remote Meetings: What next for Local Authorities? – can be viewed here. LLG, ADSO and Bevan Brittan stressed that the guidance is "general in nature and must not be regarded as legal advice. Readers should take their own legal advice on the issues arising and any options being considered, taking into account risk and local circumstances."
On 28 April the Divisional Court ruled that meetings held by local authorities in England under the Local Government Act 1972 had to take place in person from 7 May when emergency regulations introduced in the early stages of the first lockdown expired.
The Court (Dame Victoria Sharp, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Chamberlain) also ruled shortly after that a requirement that a meeting under the 1972 Act is to be "open to the public" or "held in public" means that members of public must be admitted in person to the place where the meeting is being held.
Senior Lawyer - Advocate
Head of Legal Shared Service
Director of Legal and Governance (Monitoring Officer)
Head of Governance & University Solicitor
Locums
Poll
20-08-2025 10:00 am
15-09-2025 10:00 am
08-10-2025 10:00 am
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm