Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Districts hit out against delaying local elections for devolution programme
Decisions to delay local elections in some areas until next year in order to pursue local government reorganisation will deprive millions of voters of their local democracy, the District Councils' Network has complained.
- Details
The warning comes in response to the Government's 'priority devolution programme', which calls for councils to apply by Friday this week (10 January).
News of the programme came in December after the Government published its English Devolution White Paper, which revealed plans to replace England's county and district councils with unitary councils with populations over half a million.
Councils selected for the programme will have their upcoming May 2024 elections delayed until next year.
So far, at least nine county councils are poised to put their name down for the scheme, with more district, borough and unitary councils voicing their interest as well.
However, the chairman of the DCN, Cllr Sam Champman-Allen, said the programme would see "mega councils [...] imposed on communities" without any regard for the views of local people.
He added: "The cancellation of the local elections comes after the Government's general election manifesto neglected to mention that it sought to take power away from communities by replacing district councils with mega councils.
"Democracy is being sidelined with the local electorate being deprived of any democratic opportunity to give their verdict on a major reorganisation that will have far-reaching repercussions for the destiny of thousands of English towns and villages."
Chapman-Allen said it made "no sense" to give councils the chance to sidestep the local electorate before reorganisation proposals have been published "and when no one can tell whether this is something that residents would want".
He continued: "This could lead to an unprecedented gap of six or seven years between elections, undermining democracy.
"Instead, we need a proper debate on how best we can reform local public services to enhance them and make them more accountable to every citizen and community."
Responding to the English Devolution White Paper in December, the DCN said it feared the reorganisation proposals "put too much emphasis on creating large unitary councils with populations above 500,000".
The approach would lead to "geographically vast councils that are remote from local communities" and erode local democracy, the DCN added.
Adam Carey
Head of Legal Shared Service
Head of Governance & University Solicitor
Director of Legal and Governance (Monitoring Officer)
Senior Lawyer - Advocate
Locums
Poll
20-08-2025 10:00 am
15-09-2025 10:00 am
08-10-2025 10:00 am
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm