News
Must read
Features
August 01, 2025
Mental health tribunals and 11(7) representatives
Peter Edwards looks at the implications for 11(7) representatives and Accredited Legal Representatives of a recent Upper Tribunal ruling.
Aug 01, 2025
Disordered eating and the gaps between services – the consequences for the Court of Protection
Alex Ruck Keene KC (Hon) looks at a judgment about case management in a very difficult case involving a 17 year old with profoundly disordered eating.
Jul 22, 2025
The Assisted Dying Bill: What health and social care professionals need to know
Rebecca Fitzpatrick and Katie Viggers examine the key provisions of the Assisted Dying Bill for those working in the health and social care sector.
Jul 22, 2025
Implementing the Neighbourhood Health Service: Commissioning and procurement
Lucy Probert, Richard Parker and Ruth Griffiths set out key considerations when it comes to the commissioning and procurement of the proposed Neighbourhood Health Service.
Jul 11, 2025
PFI – a new era?
Melanie Pears explores the recent announcement by NHS England about the possibility of a private finance model for capital developments, alongside the Treasury's calls for it to be only used in very limited circumstances.
Jul 03, 2025
PFI - A New Era?
Melanie Pears explores the recent announcement by NHS England about the possibility of a private finance model for capital developments, alongside the Treasury's calls for it to be only used in very limited circumstances.
Jun 19, 2025
The final say
The Court of Protection has provided an important reminder that it is the judge who has the final say as to best interests, writes Alex Ruck Keene KC (Hon).
Webinars
The Landmark Listen: Public Podcast – Standing
David Blundell QC, Richard Turney and Miranda Butler provide a detailed overview of the decision in the Good Law Project challenge and case law on the link between standing and timing in judicial review.
More features
May 02, 2025
Abbasi and Haastrup: to name or not to name
Last month saw the handing down of the long-awaited judgment of the Supreme Court in joined cases on the identification of clinicians in end-of-life cases. The ruling has a potential wide-ranging impact across the health and care sectors, writes Hannah Taylor.
Apr 25, 2025
Transfers from hospital to social care
What are the key laws that need to be upheld when transferring people from NHS hospital to local authority social care? Elizabeth Ridley explains.
Apr 15, 2025
Court of Protection case update: April 2025
Niamh Brennan rounds up the latest Court of Protection rulings of interest to practitioners.
Mar 19, 2025
Issuing proceedings in best interests cases
Katie Viggers, Mark Barnett and Hannah Khan set out four key takeaways for Integrated Care Boards from a recent case where a senior judge stressed the “crucial significance” of issuing proceedings promptly in a best interests case.
Mar 19, 2025
Court of Protection case law update: March 2025
Sarah Hutchinson analyses two recent Court of Protection rulings of interest to practitioners.
Feb 20, 2025
Homelessness and health
Julia Jones and Julie Bennett look at government guidance which suggests that the discharging from hospital of people at risk of or experiencing homelessness is a window of opportunity to address an individual’s complex needs.
Feb 19, 2025
Capacity, insight and professional cultures
Alex Ruck Keene KC (Hon) looks at an important new decision from the Court of Protection where the judge identified an evidential divide on capacity between social workers and clinicians.
Feb 19, 2025
Court of Protection update: February 2025
Sarah Hutchinson rounds up the latest Court of Protection rulings of interest to practitioners.
Dec 13, 2024
Providing support for children with complex needs
Alex Ruck Keene KC (Hon) examines a recent High Court case concerning the Mental Health Act, ‘detainability,’ and judicial scrutiny (and the real underlying problems of children with complex needs).
Nov 20, 2024
Fluctuating capacity, the “longitudinal approach” and practical dilemmas
David Lock KC asks whether a “longitudinal approach” to when decisions can lawfully be made by patients with fluctuating capacity is consistent with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (“the MCA”) and, if it is not, whether there is a better framework that could be used to enable decisions to be taken to protect this vulnerable class of persons using the inherent jurisdiction.
Events
Directory
