Newsletter registration

Don’t refuse to mediate! Engage
Smile for the Camera?
ADHD diagnosis and disability
The coroner's duty to notify the DPP
Racist comments from one employee to another

Court of Protection case update: July 2025
Maximising ROI in renewable energy: Legal, technical, and financial strategies for net-zero success
Personal circumstances, public safety, and the planning balance
The Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets (Wales) Bill: the key provisions
Errors of law, materiality and remedies

What next for rent reviews?
Commonhold reform – the beginning of the end?
The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Early insights into the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
The section 58 defence in the Highways Act 1980
Risk assessments in care proceedings: L-G and Re T
Turbulence ahead
PFI – a new era?
Costs in discrimination claims brought by litigants in person
The Building Safety Act and retrospective service charge protection
Right to Buy (RTB) leases — be warned about service charges
Awaab’s Law – implementation of Phase 1
Seven key insights: Lord Justice Birss considers AI in civil justice
Imperative requirements in homelessness: nuts and bolts on a bumpy roadmap to suitable accommodation
Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System Panel Discussion
Employment Law Webinar Series - May to July - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths - Dissecting Section 16J: Criminal Confusion in the Renters’ Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Home Truths: Grounds for Possession under the Renters' Rights Bill - 42 Bedford Row
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
High Court Dismisses Challenge to New Super Prison
AI, copyright and LLMs
Automatic suspensions and the public interest
FOI and communication
Too much?
Deploying ‘ADR’ in Planning & Compensation contexts
Removal from the village green register
The attendance of experts in family proceedings
Local authority enforcement powers and domestic beekeeping
Too little? When intervention is not required
Closures of educational sites
Public law case update Q1 2025
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Must read

Families refusing access to support
Borough consults on planning measures to tackle 'buy-to-leave' properties
A London borough has launched a consultation on planning measures aimed at tackling the rise in ‘buy-to-leave’ properties in its area.
- Details
The problem is properties sold as investments, often marketed off-plan overseas, and left to stand empty, Islington Council said. The issue is especially acute in the south of the borough, near the City.
Islington said empty new homes were “wasted supply” and failing to contribute to the area’s need for new places to live.
The local authority has drafted planning measures that would require owners of new properties to ensure that they are occupied.
“The draft measures represent the first time a local authority has tried to tackle ‘buy-to-leave’ using planning powers,” Islington claimed.
The proposed measures – to apply to new rather than existing properties – would mean new homes could not be left unoccupied or unused for longer than three months, and would have to be occupied for at least 14 days in any three-month period.
“If a property is left unoccupied for more than three months, the council would be able to take legal action such as seeking an injunction from the High Court against the owner,” Islington said.
“Persistently breaking the injunction could lead to a fine, prison and even seizure of the empty property.”
Cllr James Murray, Islington's executive member for housing and development, said: "In Islington, as across London, there is a desperate shortage of housing. It's wrong when new homes sit there empty purely as investments, when Londoners are desperately trying to find somewhere to live.
"Our new proposals would make sure that all new homes in Islington are occupied – we want to send a message that ‘buy-to-leave’ is unacceptable."
Islington’s consultation, Preventing Wasted Housing Supply Supplementary Planning Document, runs until 30 January 2015. It can be viewed here.
22-10-2025 4:00 pm
05-11-2025 4:00 pm