New statutory code announced – is the tide turning on the practice of ‘fire and rehire’?
As the Government launches a crackdown on the practice of ‘fire and rehire’, Julie Bann and Christian Grierson ask whether this really is the end for the controversial practice?
- Details
Fire and rehire is the term used in circumstances where an employee refuses to accept new terms and conditions of employment and the employer reacts by dismissing the employee but offering continued employment on the new terms.
In early 2022, we wrote about the case of we wrote about the case of USDAW & others v Tesco Stores Limited, where the High Court granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in one particular situation. It appeared that may trigger a turning point in the use of the practice. However, the Court of Appeal then overturned the High Court’s decision. While the outcome didn’t effectively outlaw ‘fire and rehire practices’ it created public interest and objection to the practice.
In March 2022, public outrage was sparked again by the mass P&O sackings. Where the ferry company deliberately sought to evade the law by sacking over 700 seafarers without due consultation. So controversial was this move that it shone a light on any practice, including of ‘fire and rehire’, which appears to contravene employees’ rights.
The Government has picked up on the public mood and on 24 January 2023, announced a consultation on a planned statutory code of practice, which seeks to protect employees and clamp down on employers that use the controversial tactic.
This new Code will set out employers’ responsibilities when seeking to change contractual terms and conditions of employment, including an obligation for the businesses to consult with employees in a fair and transparent way when proposing changes to their employment terms. The Code does not directly ban the practice of fire and rehire but implements a number of key guidelines to ensure a fair process is followed when agreeing contractual changes.
While it is not a legal requirement to follow the code, the current proposal indicates that once in force, the Courts and Tribunals will have the power to apply a 25% uplift to an employee’s compensation in an unfair dismissal claim if an employer breached the statutory code.
In short, the proposed Code stops short of banning the practice but should be seen as a very clear deterrent to any employer in planning any change management process.
It is unlikely that the Code will bring an end to the ‘fire and re-hire’ practice and the final version of the Code may be subject to substantial change, but it is evident that the tide on fire and rehire is shifting and the focus must be on genuine consultation and agreement. Termination of employment will become a last resort and not used as a tool to influence the consultation on agreeing terms.
Public sector organisations tend to be unionised and are already open to scrutiny of employment practices so the Code when published will have less impact than in other sectors. An effective consultation process is more likely to result in a positive solution and as importantly maintain a positive ongoing employment relationship. Mutual agreement between the staff and the employer to change the terms and conditions will always be the safest option. The Code has the potential to guide the process and ensure both employer and employee benefit.
The consultation is due to end on 18 April 2023 and the date for the Code coming into force is unconfirmed but likely to be later in the year.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
Jul 03, 2025
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiryAanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Jul 03, 2025
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and moreOn the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Jun 24, 2025
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Jun 24, 2025
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructureNicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Jun 19, 2025
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Jun 17, 2025
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water InfrastructureIs it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |