Minimal financial assistance for grant recipients

However, before a public authority can award an MFA subsidy, the proposed recipient must confirm that it will not exceed the MFA threshold. Recipients might receive something similar to the below:

“The amount of MFA offered is £65,000. Before making payment, we require written confirmation that receipt of the payment will not exceed your MFA threshold of £315,000 cumulated over this and the previous two financial years, as specified in section 36(1) of the Subsidy Control Act (2022).”

We consider below how recipients can ensure compliance with the MFA regime.

What’s the threshold?

The MFA regime allows public authorities to award low value subsidies, up to £315,000.

However, £315,000 is a cumulative total. A recipient can receive no more than £315,000 in MFA or comparable types of subsidies over the elapsed part of the current financial year and the two financial years which precede the current financial year.

What are comparable types of subsidies?

As per the Statutory Guidance:

• MFA subsidies;
• Services of Public Economic Interest (SPEI) assistance;
• De minimis EU State aid; and
• Subsidies given as small amounts of financial assistance under the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

Examples

Assuming a subsidy is to be awarded in the current financial year (2023/2024), a recipient cannot have received any comparable subsidies since 1 April 2021 which in cumulation with the subsidy to be awarded have a value of £315,000 or more. By way of example:

What does this mean?

If the subsidy to be awarded does not cause the grant recipient to exceed its MFA threshold, the recipient can confirm the same to the public authority in writing. The authority may proceed to award the MFA subsidy.

If, however, the subsidy would tip the recipient over the threshold, the recipient should be sure not to unlawfully confirm its compliance with the MFA regime (when it is in fact non-compliant). The prospective recipient should write to the authority to confirm that the MFA regime does not apply to the subsidy.

The public authority will consider how to award the subsidy lawfully. The authority may undertake a compliance assessment for the part of the subsidy which would take the recipient over the threshold. Alternatively, the authority may choose to adhere to all requirements of the Act. That decision is for the public authority, but the fact that a recipient is above the MFA threshold should not, in and of itself, prevent a subsidy being awarded.

If a recipient confirms that it is compliant with the MFA regime when in reality it is not, the consequences may be severe (both on a company and individual basis). False representation is a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006. Companies can incur heavy fines and suffer reputational damage. Directors can also be held personally liable (and in serious cases be imprisoned).

Discussion

The new subsidy control regime represents new law for public authorities and grant recipients alike. While the majority of the Act’s requirements apply to public authorities, businesses receiving MFA subsidies must also ensure that they do so lawfully. This may include enterprises receiving business rates relief.

Recipients should adhere to the Sharpe Pritchard rules for compliance with the subsidy control regime for enterprises:

Do confirm in writing that your business is below the MFA threshold. You can only receive an MFA subsidy once you have done so.

However, do not under any circumstances confirm that your business is below the MFA threshold if the opposite is, or may be, true. This may have severe consequences as outlined above.

Instead, you should inform the public authority that you are above threshold, which should not in and of itself prevent you receiving the subsidy.

You must keep a record of MFA subsidies received, the dates that they are awarded, and the gross value amount of such assistance. Retaining such a record for at least three years is a statutory requirement under section 37(6) of the Act. It will also help confirm compliance in the event of future MFA subsidies.

Consider any grant funding agreement suggested by the public authority and understand its terms to ensure compliance.

Oliver Slater is a Junior Associate and Dannii Wise a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP

Sharpe Pritchard’s subsidy control team is fully conversant with the requirements and procedures of the subsidy control regime. We advise both public authorities awarding grants and grant beneficiaries. We are on hand to assist businesses with the issues discussed in this article, including by providing legal opinions to confirm compliance with the subsidy control regime. We discussed the MFA regime from the public authority perspective in a previous article.

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any of the issues raised in this article, please contact us today by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk.