Restrictive covenants – when to refuse consent
Niki Constantinou and Dannii Wise analyse a High Court case on the reasonableness of a refusal of consent under a restrictive covenant.
- Details
A restrictive covenant is a promise from one party (covenantor) that they will restrict the use of the land which they are occupying for the benefit of another party’s land (covenantee).
Some restrictive covenants are absolute, whilst qualified covenants prohibit use without the prior consent of the covenantee (qualified covenants usually expressly state that the consent of the covenantee shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed). However, what considerations must the covenantee take into account when refusing to give its consent?
The High Court examined these questions in the recent case of Davies-Gilbert v Goacher & Ors [2022] EWHC 969 (Ch).
Facts
The Claimant owned land in East Sussex, part of which benefitted from a restrictive covenant. The Defendant’s land was burdened by the covenant.
The covenant stipulated that the Defendant may “not erect upon any part of the property hereby conveyed any other messuage, erection, building or wall whatsoever without such previous written licence as aforesaid such licence not be unreasonably withheld”.
The Defendant proposed to construct two buildings on the land. However, the Claimant refused to consent insisting that the construction would:
- have a detrimental impact on the amenity value of the land; and
- threaten the future use and commercial value of the neighbouring land.
The Defendant believed that the Claimant’s refusal to consent was unreasonable and proceeded with the construction of the two buildings.
Whilst the Claimant maintained their reasoning for refusal, the Defendant argued that the Claimant had assessed “irrelevant considerations” in refusing consent.
Decision
The Court had to fundamentally determine the reasonableness of the Claimant’s refusal to consent and for the first time, the Court also had to tackle the question as to whether the considerations which attributed to the refusal were relevant.
The Court held that the Claimant’s refusal to consent was reasonable taking into account what was concluded to be reasonable considerations in the Claimant’s decision-making process. The Claimant was awarded a declaration to that effect, together with injunctive relief.
Legal Principles
In reaching its decision, the Court provided several legal principles which can now be observed in any case where reasonableness of consent under a restrictive covenant is in question. In summary:
- the Court must initially establish the reasons behind a covenantee refusing consent;
- reasons and considerations are not alike. The latter may be potentially broader than the former;
- the decision-making process of the covenantee must be reasonable as well as the outcome;
- the covenantee must have excluded extraneous considerations in making their decision However, the refusal will not be automatically rendered unreasonable because of an irrelevant consideration being regarded. This will depend on the weight given to such consideration in the decision-making process; and
- where there is a refusal for a combination of good and bad reasons, the refusal would still be reasonable if there was at least one single good reason and the covenantee would arrive at the same decision.
Takeaways
- A covenantee will have reasonably refused consent if at least one good reason is provided for in the refusal.
- The reasons and considerations behind the covenantee’s refusal must be examined separately.
- The onus is on the covenantor to prove that the covenantee’s refusal of consent is unreasonable.
Niki Constantinou is an Associate and Dannii Wise is a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
Jul 03, 2025
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiryAanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Jul 03, 2025
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and moreOn the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Jun 24, 2025
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Jun 24, 2025
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructureNicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Jun 19, 2025
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Jun 17, 2025
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water InfrastructureIs it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |