Local Government Lawyer

London Borough of Tower Hamlets Vacancies


Challenges for a local authority prosecutor

Emma Hall provides some tips for local authority prosecutors on how to limit the costs incurred in prosecuting a case.
October 17, 2025
Challenges for a local authority prosecutor

Who can show up?

Andrew Burrell and Francis Hoar set out the key considerations for determining the composition of local government committees.
October 17, 2025
Who can show up?

Placement at home under a care order

The Court of Appeal recently had another opportunity to look at care orders where children are to remain at home; a less common outcome following the earlier decision in Re JW (Child at home under care order) [2023] EWCA Civ 944. It was dealing with a change of plan imposed by…
October 17, 2025
Placement at home under a care order

The Welsh Language and the Court of Protection

The first Court of Protection judgment to be published in the Welsh language is, hopefully, the first of many, write Daniel Taylor and Teagan Thomas-Walters.
October 17, 2025
The Welsh Language and the Court of Protection

ASB Case Reviews: updated statutory guidance

Daryl Bigwood looks at the key changes to the statutory guidance on ASB Case Reviews and identifies their practical implications for social landlords.
October 17, 2025
ASB Case Reviews: updated statutory guidance

Deprivations of liberty and young offenders

The High Court recently refused an application by a local authority for an order authorising the deprivation of a 16 year old boy. Caitlin Smithey explains why.
October 17, 2025
Deprivations of liberty and young offenders

Revisiting Cheshire West

Later this month the Supreme Court will examine issues raised in its landmark Cheshire West ruling on deprivations of liberty. Lucy Series sets out what is at stake.
October 10, 2025
Revisiting Cheshire West

How not to control second homes

A recent case shows some of the problems with the decision to use permitted development and Article 4 directions as a means to control…
Oct 09, 2025
How not to control second homes

Twelve New Towns for the Future

James Goldthorpe and Conrad Turnock summarise the New Towns Taskforce’s report to Government, published on 28th September, and ask - what…
Oct 09, 2025
Twelve New Towns for the Future

Artificial intelligence in Education and EHC Plans

Alice de Coverley and Jim Hirschmann analyse the opportunities and risks arising from the use of AI in education and education, health and…
Oct 03, 2025
Artificial intelligence in Education and EHC Plans

High Court on highway widths

Charles Streeten analyses the High Court’s rejection of a challenge to confirmation of a definitive map modification order.
Oct 03, 2025
High Court on highway widths

Risk assessment – a safeguard to fairness

William Green examines the risk assessment criteria set out by the Court of Appeal for child welfare cases and how local authorities can…
Oct 03, 2025
Risk assessment – a safeguard to fairness

Parental obstruction of care

Victoria Flowers looks at the lessons from a highly unusual case in which a care order was granted for a young person (C) who was…
Oct 03, 2025
Parental obstruction of care

Transparency in the Court of Protection

What is transparency good for and how long should restrictions last? Alex Ruck Keene KC (Hon) examines a recent ruling by Mr Justice Poole.
Oct 03, 2025
Transparency in the Court of Protection

Tackling youth ASB in social housing

Emily Hope looks at the role of housing providers and the need to balance enforcement with engagement when it comes to tackling youth…
Oct 02, 2025
Tackling youth ASB in social housing

How AI could rewrite homelessness law

Amandeep Bains sets out the key considerations if AI is to be used in homelessness decision-making.
Oct 02, 2025
How AI could rewrite homelessness law

Sep 26, 2025

PFI expiry and handback

Emma Beynon and Alex Lawrence assess PFI expiry and handback, a big moment for public sector infrastructure.
Sep 19, 2025

A hard road

Justin Gray considers the use of secure transport for looked after children being placed in Scotland.
Sep 18, 2025

Below-threshold contracts

Tim Care examines the Procurement Act 2023's regime for below-threshold contracts and highlights key practical considerations for…
Sep 17, 2025

Brief enquiry of age

Interim relief was recently granted in a judicial review challenge involving three local authorities over an age assessment. Susan Ferrin…
Sep 17, 2025

All things PFI

Ciara Campfield looks at preparing for exit, planning future needs and how schools can get a better deal from their PFI contract.
Sep 12, 2025

Public Law Case Update Q2 2025

Kieran Laird offers a straightforward and concise overview of six public law and regulation cases from the second quarter of 2025 which…
Sep 11, 2025

Imposing the brakes on car cruising

Shabinah Ladha discusses Mr Justice Ritchie’s approach in justifying the continuation of ‘car cruising’ injunctions across Birmingham and…
Sep 04, 2025

Late costs budgets and sanctions

A court recently reduced a claimant's recoverable costs by 20% where a costs budget was filed over two years late, in a case involving a…
Sep 03, 2025

Epping Forest in the Court of Appeal

Robin Green analyses the Court of Appeal’s decision to set aside an interim injunction against the accommodation of asylum seekers at a…
Aug 29, 2025

Banter in the classroom

Was it fair to dismiss a teacher for calling pupils' 'hideous' and 'jaws'? Alexandra Addington looks at the outcome of a recent Employment…

Tim Care evaluates the payment obligations for contracting authorities under the Procurement Act 2023 including the requirement to publish a Payment Compliance Notice as well as the regulations surrounding electronic invoicing and payment.

The Procurement Act 2023 (the Act) came into force on 24th February 2025.

The Act, in particular, revoked the following:

  • Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR)
  • Concession Contracts Regulations 2016
  • Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016

Further information on Payment Compliance Notices and regulations surrounding electronic invoicing and payment.

Implied payment terms

The Guidance states that he objective of Section 68(2) is to oblige contracting authorities to pay suppliers’ invoices within 30 days from the day the invoice is received or, if later, by the day on which the payment becomes due in accordance with the invoice.

Section 68(2) does not apply if the contracting authority considers the invoice invalid or disputes the invoice. If this is the case, the contracting authority must notify the payee of the same without undue delay.

Payment Compliance Notice

From 1st October 2025, contracting authorities will be required to publish a Payment Compliance Notice on the Central Digital Platform within 30 days of the end of a ‘reporting period’ (Section 69(1)). Section 69(3) states that a reporting period begins on the day on which Section 69 comes into force (1st October 2025) and ends on the following 31 March or 30 September, whichever is earlier. Following that, the reporting period is each successive six months.

The purpose of a Payment Compliance Notice is to provide transparency over how promptly authorities pay their suppliers in accordance with Section 68(2).

Regulation 38 outlines that the Payment Compliance Notice must include (among others):

  • the average number of days taken to make payments under public contracts during the reporting period;
  • the percentage of invoices paid in accordance with the term in Section 68(2) of the Act during the reporting period; and
  • a statement of the director or similar officer approving the Payments Compliance Notice.

Calculating compliance

Contracting authorities will need to calculate the number of days it takes them to pay each relevant invoice. The Guidance explains that ‘Day 1’ is the day after the Invoice Day, which is the day a contracting authority receives an invoice.

Regulation 38(4) provides that payment is made when it is received by the supplier. If there is a delay in receipt for which the contracting authority is not responsible, then the regulation provides that payment is made when it would have been received without that delay.

When calculating the average number of days to pay an invoice, as well as the percentage of invoices paid in accordance with the Act, contracting authorities should only include invoices that were paid during the reporting period (regardless of when they were received). Invoices which remain unpaid at the period end, even if received in that reporting period, should be excluded.

However, where a valid and undisputed invoice is received during the reporting period and the contracting authority was required to pay it in that reporting period (i.e. because the deadline for payment was a date within the reporting period), but did not pay it, that invoice is counted as an invoice that should have been paid and therefore included in the calculation.

Invoices which are partially paid should be treated as unpaid and only reported as paid within the relevant reporting period in which they are fully paid. If the supplier has agreed to the partial payment, the invoice is considered paid on the date the payment was made or, if later, the date the supplier agreed to the partial payment.

If the parties agree to pay in instalments from the outset, each instalment is treated like a separate invoice. The 30-day payment clock starts from receipt of the first invoice (the first instalment). However, if instalments arise because a supplier later agrees to defer part of an already-issued full invoice, the clock still runs from the original invoice’s receipt date.

Electronic invoicing

Section 67 provides that a term is implied into every public contract that requires contracting authorities to accept and process electronic invoices that are in the ‘required electronic form’ and are not disputed. An electronic invoice is defined in Section 67(3) as an invoice which is issued, transmitted and received in a structured electronic format that allows for its automatic and electronic processing.

The Guidance stresses that contracting authorities and suppliers are not prevented from agreeing an alternative invoicing system, for example a paper invoice to be sent by post to the contracting authority. However, suppliers will always have the right to submit an electronic invoice and for that to be processed for payment, provided it is in the required electronic form and not disputed.

What does this mean?

From 1st October 2025, contracting authorities will need to establish and maintain robust processes to capture and calculate payment data accurately for every six-month reporting period. Authorities will need to prepare a Payment Compliance Notice for publication on the Central Digital Platform, which must be approved by senior leadership. While these measures promote transparency, consistency, and prompt supplier payments, they place greater responsibility on contracting authorities to maintain accurate records, monitor compliance continuously, and invest in systems and training to avoid reputational or regulatory risk.

 Tim Care is a partner at Ward Hadaway.